1. Welcome to the CivilWarTalk, a forum for questions and discussions about the American Civil War! Become a member today for full access to all of our resources, it's fast, simple, and absolutely free! If you aren't ready for that, try posting your question or comment as a guest!

The War of Northern Aggression

Discussion in 'Civil War History - General Discussion' started by factasy.com, Feb 17, 2012.

  1. factasy.com Private

    Member Since:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Message Count:
    108
    Location:
    Sweden
    The War of Northern Aggression

    Submitted by Bilinda on Sat, 02/18/2012 - 01:29
    Also referred to as "The Great Unpleasantness", the War of Northern Aggression occurred at least 100 years ago between the North and South of the United States. Many, many people died, and they did so for one reason (contrary to common knowledge): E-points. It is a great source of drama for many people in the South who still can't believe they lost, and gets great lulz from historians who debate endlessly about the causes of the war and the minutiæ of the battles and battlefields of the war.
    http://www.factasy.com/civil_war/blogs/bilinda/war_northern_aggression
    Please do the comments at my site,do you now have a account,but you have facbook,so can you use that to login
  2. Post Robot


    (Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)
  3. Bob Owen First Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Jun 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,374
    Location:
    Tennessee
    It was 150 years ago! It still is fought today!
  4. damYankee Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Message Count:
    614
    I would argue that it is not being fought today. The CSA lasted four short years, except for that short span of time citizens of the South have been on the whole as loyal to the USA as anybody else. They fought in our Revolution, they served in the War of 1812, they served in many wars from Mexico to the Spanish American War, WWI WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and in our current conflicts. President LBJ, Carter, Clinton and GW Bush are all residents of Southern states.
    There are a minority of people who imagine themselves the avengers of a lost cause or the victims of some great mis-deed. Playing the victim does give some people a sense of worth. I sincerely believe if we had a time machine and could send them back to Antebellum South they wouldn't last 1 day.
    I also believe that when this nation faces a external threat, these same people would be the first to stand up next to their Yankee Brothers and defend this nation they so brilliantly try to denounce and embarrass on a regular basis.
  5. oldpete63 First Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,674
    A perfect example of the unity of this country was Sept. 11th, 2001 - Everybody pulled together - north, south, east, west - I personally saw volunteers, fiefighters etc. from all over the country - and most travelled at their own cost - why, to help. In fact, when folks, a few weeks later, started cuttin' lanes with their cars, not holding doors open etc. - I think most were glad - we were back to normal :wink:. In some ways, it's relevant to the Civil War - folks identified themselves to their home state - whether it's sports, weather, politeness - we take pride in our own states. But let something bad happen - then we're ALL Americans. Human nature, I guess, and a good thing.
  6. damYankee Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Message Count:
    614
    Oldpete, we saw the same thing in Joplin Mo. last year, in fact the rebuilding by volunteers goes on today.
  7. seboyle First Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,202
    Location:
    Squamish, B.C.
    You're talking about the War of Southern Aggression aren't you?
    1st OVHA likes this.
  8. Rebel from Finland Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    813
    Location:
    Helsinki Finland
    Glorybound likes this.
  9. factasy.com Private

    Member Since:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Message Count:
    108
    Location:
    Sweden
    Seeing that there are more people who have seen the truth away in the States :smoke:
  10. factasy.com Private

    Member Since:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Message Count:
    108
    Location:
    Sweden
    It was a long time since you heard a song from them
  11. Rebel from Finland Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    813
    Location:
    Helsinki Finland
    That song was a hit when I was 15 or so, it was even chosen our class "official song" not by my vote, thats for sure, but the title of the song fits well in this thread.. Here we go again.. (was it the war of northern aggression, war over slavery etc etc.) :smile:
    factasy.com likes this.
  12. RobertP 2nd Lieutenant

    Member Since:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Message Count:
    3,009
    Location:
    on the long winding road
    Why do I feel I just got thrown a bone?
  13. unionblue Lt. Colonel

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    12,482
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Too bad that the phrase, "The War of Northern Aggression" simply does not fit the facts of history, Ann.

    It's like claiming the victim of a mugging deserved to be beaten up by the mugger and somehow "asked for" such a beating.

    The States that made up the Confederacy went willingly to war with the North for one reason, and one reason only.

    They thought they could win.
  14. factasy.com Private

    Member Since:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Message Count:
    108
    Location:
    Sweden
    Names For The Civil War
    http://www.civilwarhome.com/civilwarnames.htm
  15. KeyserSoze First Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,222
    Location:
    Kansas City
    Post deleted by Glorybound - insulting to another member, inflammatory, flame bait.

    Posted as moderator
  16. unionblue Lt. Colonel

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    12,482
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ann,

    I know many of the names for the American Civil War, to include its official name, "The War of the Rebellion."

    But the name you gave is of a more recent flavor, which has little or no historical significance, to me or others, only to those who happen to like the sound of it, not for the historical accuracy of it.

    Sincerely,
    Unionblue
  17. factasy.com Private

    Member Since:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Message Count:
    108
    Location:
    Sweden
    And what is wrong with the site then??
  18. factasy.com Private

    Member Since:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Message Count:
    108
    Location:
    Sweden
    War usually have many names, and that's seldom that they get a fair name.
    But you can agree that civil war is a good name
    Glorybound likes this.
  19. BillO First Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,513
    Location:
    Quinton, VA.
    We have been for 100 years. It's what we do. When the twin towers went down they took a bunch of yankees with them. They may have been yankees but they were OUR yankees and the only ones allowed to mess with them is US!
    unionblue likes this.
  20. KeyserSoze First Sergeant

    Member Since:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,222
    Location:
    Kansas City
    Post deleted by Glorybound - insulting to another member, inflammatory.

    To the few folks to whom this might apply: you can load your posts with expletives, but the use of an asterisk (*) in place of one letter will hardly mask the word, it still is quite obvious even to one whose native language is not English. Totally unacceptable.

    Posted as moderator
  21. OpnCoronet 2nd Lieutenant

    Member Since:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Message Count:
    3,298
    As already noted the war is more properly called the 'Civil War' but, as also noted previously, the descriptive 'aggression' is more properly, in historical terms and facts, applicable to the csa. The authority of the People of the United States and their Constitution and gov't and laws were under attack by insurrectionary forces of the slave states too strong to be put down by legal procedures normally provided for such attacks in the organic law of the land.

Share This Page